Quotes, April 2013

“You can be remarkable or busy, but not both.”
-Cal Newport

“We all have stories that we tell ourselves about what our lives are—and those stories are always wrong.”
-Shawn Coyne

“Contracts mean NOTHING for it is ALWAYS the character of the person signing that contract. This is what lawyers do not get.”
-Martin Armstrong

“People who say they are bored are boring people. Interesting people can entertain themselves anywhere. Boring people have to be entertained by others.”
-Roger Knapp

“Doing is better than perfect.”
-Facebook company motto

“The meaning of life is to create meaning for your life.”
-Tucker Max

“Academics are, on average, pussies.”
-David Buss

“Almost all our suffering is the product of our thoughts.”
-Sam Harris

“Everything you say and everything you do has to prove what you believe. A WHY is just a belief. That’s all it is.”
-Simon Sinek

“As much as we thirst for approval, we dread condemnation.”
-Hans Selye

“Steep is the way to mastery. Often nothing keeps the pupil on the move but his faith in his teacher, whose mastery is now beginning to dawn on him. He is a living example of the inner work, and he convinces by his mere presence.”
-Eugen Herrigel

“He who has a hundred miles to walk should reckon ninety as half the journey.”
-Awa Kenzo

“You know already that you should not grieve over bad shots; learn now not to rejoice over the good ones. You must free yourself from the buffetings of pleasure and pain, and learn to rise above them in easy equanimity, to rejoice as though not you but another had shot well. This, too, you must practice unceasingly—you cannot conceive how important it is.”
-Awa Kenzo

“When you understand what your shortcomings are and act upon correcting them, that is being a Buddha.”
-Awa Kenzo

“Self-reflection encourages great bravery. Rationalization is your greatest enemy.”
-Awa Kenzo

“Do your best at each and everything.  That is the key to success.  Learn one thing well and you will learn how to understand ten thousand things.  Ten thousand things are one; this is the secret place of understanding you must find.  Then everything is mysterious and wonderful.”
-Awa Kenzo

“People say that what we’re all seeking is a meaning for life.  I don’t think that’s what we’re really seeking.  I think that what we’re seeking is an experience of being alive, so that our life experiences on the purely physical plane will have resonances within our own innermost being and reality, so that we actually feel the rapture of being alive.”
-Joseph Campbell

“Myths are stories for our search through the ages for truth, for meaning, for significance. We all need to tell our story and to understand our story.  We all need to understand death and to cope with death, and we all need help in our passages from birth to live and then to death.  We need for life to signify, to touch the eternal, to understand the mysterious, to find out who we are.”
-Joseph Campbell

“In the dojo, aim for truth.
At home, aim for harmony.
At work, aim for progress.
Among friends, aim for trust.
In the world, aim for sincerity.”
-Awa Kenzo

 

 

See Tucker Max On Broadway, Get Free Beer

Last week tickets went on sale for the stage adaptation of my book, “I Hope They Serve Beer on Broadway.” The two shows I’m attending sold out pretty much immediately, so the director added more shows and asked me to stay for them.

Since I’ve never seen a Broadway play and have no idea what this will be like, I told him I’d do it on two conditions: Not only do I get free drinks (yes, there is a bar at the theater), but ALL MY FANS WHO COME TO SHOWS GET ONE FREE DRINK AS WELL.

He agreed. I was kinda joking, but he said yes, so fuck it let’s do it.

Here it is: If you come to any of the shows in June, I will be there and will buy you one free drink at the bar. This applies to every show in June, until they all sell out (there will are 16 total). Looks like I’m spending the month of June in NYC.

This is 100% legit. If you’ve always wanted to get a drink with me, here is your guaranteed chance. No catch, no goofy shit to do, nothing like that. All you have to do is buy a ticket, show up, and come up and ask me for you drink. [I guess I should mention you have to be 21 to get this, but if you don't know that yet, you're an idiot].

Now go buy your tickets, and I’ll see you there. 

Other stuff about the play thats less cool than free drinks:

Press: So the director, Christopher Carter Sanderson, and I went on Fox Business to talk about the show. Its more a segment about the economics of the play and Broadway audiences, and thus kinda boring, so I don’t recommend you watch it, but here it is.

Met Abe Goldfarb: I was in NYC this weekend and got to meet the guy playing me, Abe Goldfarb. I saw the burlesque show that he MC’s, the guy is obviously very talented, but man…if I was trying to think up a man to be as opposite as me as possible, this could be the guy I ended up with. I don’t even know where to start describing him; he’s incredibly nice, married, into all kinds of kinky stuff…I could go on and on, but there’s no need. It honestly doesn’t matter what he’s like in real life as comparison to me, because this show isn’t about me. The show is something completely different, and it doesn’t matter if the character of Tucker Max in the play is just like I am in real life. What matters is that the audience likes the play, and laughs their asses off, and I think Abe is the type of actor who can deliver that sort of performance. I guess we’ll see.

This whole play thing is so weird for me: This is the first creative project I’ve ever been involved in where I am…in the background. I mean, yes its based on my life and my writing of course, but at this point, I am kinda irrelevant to this play in any substantive way. I have no creative input, I’m not casting it, I won’t be going to rehearsals, and the first time I see it will with opening night, June 5th. This isn’t bad or good. It’s just very different from anything I’ve ever experienced.

A lot of my fans will like this more than the movie: One of the biggest critiques of the movie was that it wasn’t completely true to the book. Of course it couldn’t be, because the movie has to have a narrative and the book didn’t, but so many of my fans didn’t care; they just wanted to see the stories acted out. Well, that is EXACTLY what this play is. 98% of it is ripped directly from the books; the only stuff that changed is a little bit of editing to only have the best parts, and then transitions or stuff like that. So know that if that was your issue with the movie, rest assured, that won’t be an issue with the play.

The midget story in the play, and the woman playing her is awesome: I almost think this woman deserves her own post. Athena Reich is a radical feminist, and a lesbian, and loves my books and is super excited to play the midget. So there’s that.

tuckermidget

 

I Hope They Serve Beer on Broadway

You may have heard something about a play based on my book thats coming out soon. This is not bullshit. It’s a real thing, its called “I Hope They Serve Beer on Broadway,” and it begins June 5th. Here’s the Variety article about it, and here’s where you can get tickets.

There are quite a few funny things about this play:

First: The only thing I know about Broadway plays is that I’ve never been to one.

Second: Look at the name of the dude playing me: Abe Goldfarb. He’s pictured below. Yes, that is exactly what you think it is: A Ginger Jew. That dude is playing me, Tucker Max, in this play. Seriously. AbeGoldfarb

Third: Unlike every other creative project I am involved in, I had nothing to do with creating this play. I get no credit if it’s amazing.

Here’s what happened:

A few years ago Kit Sanderson met with me about doing a play based on my book. Since I know nothing about plays and have no real desire to learn, I cut a deal with him: He does all the work in adapting my book to the stage, he can have full creative freedom in every way in creating it, but I wanted the playwright credit (for legal/IP reasons I’ll explain later). He agreed. That’s why the official title is “I Hope They Serve Beer in Broadway by Tucker Max,” but I’m not creatively involved at all. This is Kit Sandersons baby, from start to finish.

Some things I do know about the play:

1. You can drink there: They will serve beer at the theater: Seriously, full bar during all performances.

2. It’s ripped directly from the book: Unlike the movie, the play is very true to the book; dialogue, characters, scenes, etc, are all almost the same. I have no idea how he’s going to pull some of this off, but he’s going to try.

3. I’m not involved at all beyond source material: Kit raised the money to do the play, cast it, designed it, and directed it completely without any creative feedback from me. I literally have no idea where he’s going to take this. He’s never asked, I’ve never offered. I’m going to see his full vision when you do: On opening night. This is unusual for me. I’ve never really had a situation where my creative work was not only not under my control, but completely out of my control. I literally have no say on anything.

 

I will have a lot more to write about this in coming weeks. I am going to do some press with Kit this week, meet Abe (The Ginger Jew who’s playing me), and I’ll talk about how this play is the complete opposite of the movie and the interesting economics of plays later on in much more depth.

For now, go get your tickets, and I’ll see you at the show (yes, that means I’m going to be there, for at least the June 5th opening night, and the June 26th shows, those I can guarantee).

 

A quick thought about altruism

Some of you may remember my little Planned Parenthood media event, where they rejected a donation from me that would have saved one of their clinics. Then PETA swooped in and offered to take the money for a pretty cool idea. But since they are an awful organization, I countered them with the proposal to donate to a pet charity that was no-kill.

As far as anyone knows, that’s where it stands–I offered to make the donation. Nothing more was written by me or really reported at all in the press, yet after I posted that, a ton of people wrote me saying that my desire to help a no kill shelter was very noble in their eyes, changed their perception of me, etc. Or they said I was a good person because I gave this money, or that they loved that I was willing to help a charity, etc. Basically, I got a mountain of praise for this. All these people were commending me because of my donation–even though I hadn’t even made the donation yet.

And you know what no one, not once, ever asked me? Anything about the specifics of the donation, or the organization I was donating it to, or what the money would do.

Now, don’t get me wrong–I actually made the donation to Austin Pets Alive (not 500k, but many multiples more than 20k). I did it after I got to know the amazing people in that organization, I have seen the work they do and the results they get, and I love helping them, either with money or advice.  I plan to continue helping them in the future, because I believe in them and their mission.

The point is not about me, it’s not even about charity, it’s how people are. Everyone’s praise and everyone’s thoughts about the donation did NOT come from the actual results of the donation itself. They came from my public signal that I was going to give the money. No one cared what happened after I said I was giving the money.

I’ve thought a lot about this, and it meshes very well with everything I’ve ever seen in my life about charitable giving: The overwhelming majority of people who give to charities do not actually care about the cause or the results of their gift, they do it simply to signal to others what type of person they want to be seen as. To them, charity is about status, not results.

You may want to argue this point, but ask yourself this simple question: If this isn’t true, then why does almost no one actually follow-up with their charitable gifts, and see where or how the money’s being spent? Why are almost all celebrations of charitable gifts about the money being donated, and NOT the results of the gift? Or even better, look at most fund raising campaigns–they just excuses to party and show off, they have nothing to do with the actual causes.

This is NOT how I am. I only gave the money to APA once I got to know them, and I saw precisely how they were using it. Unlike most charitable organizations, APA is not a cause the masquerades as a way to raise money, its the opposite: they are amazing people doing amazing work saving the lives of thousands of dogs (and cats I guess, but who cares), and raising money is just a means for them to accomplish that mission. They are inspiring, not because of their beliefs but because of their actions.

Also, I know there are many new charities like this; in fact almost all the best new charities are very results oriented, and that is a great change in how non-profits operate. But very few large, established legacy non-profits are like this, as evidenced by the atrocious overheads costs (e.g., the United Way spends 70% of every incoming dollar on non-core costs, like paying executives and raising more money). But my point here is that I don’t think many people even think about this, even consider what drives someone to give and why, and how that impacts the entire non-profit sector:

For most people, altruism is not about meaning or results, its about status signaling to their social circle. 

 

Quotes, March 2013

“If you have a ‘passion for writing’ and never do it, you don’t have a passion for writing.”
-Jake Seliger

“Observe the reality as it is. As it is, not as you wish it to be. Perhaps your breath is deep. Perhaps your breath is shallow. Perhaps you breathed in through the left nostril. Perhaps you breathed in through the right nostril. It makes no difference.”
-Satya Narayan Goenka

“Opinions are projections.”
-Tucker Max

“The heart has its reasons of which reason knows nothing.”
-Blaise Pascal

“Growing your own food is like printing your own money.”
-Ron Finley

“Fortune is not only blind herself, but blinds the people she has embraced.”
-Cicero

“How people talk to each other absolutely determines how well the organization will function.”
-Larry Bossidy

“By their own actions, not their words, do leaders establish the morale, integrity and sense of justice of their subordinate commanders. They cannot say one thing and do another.”
-Wes Roberts

“It takes less courage to criticize the decisions of others than to stand by your own.”
-Wes Roberts

“Education is the ability to meet life’s situations.”
-Dr. John G. Hibben

“Do you know someone you would like to change and regulate and improve? Good! That is fine. I am all in favor of it, But why not begin on yourself?”
-Dale Carnegie

“When dealing with people, let us remember we are not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices and motivated by pride and vanity.”
-Dale Carnegie

“Listen to authority figures because of their position, but only believe them if they can explain why.”
-Tucker Max

“If you tell me how you get your feeling of importance, I’ll tell you what you are. That determines your character. That is the most significant thing about you.”
-Dale Carnegie

“So the only way on earth to influence other people is to talk about what they want and show them how to get it.”
-Dale Carnegie

“Unless you really understand others, you can hardly attain your own self-understanding.”
-Miyamoto Musashi

“You should not have any special fondness for a particular weapon, or anything else, for that matter. Too much of the same is not enough. Without imitating anyone else, you should have as much weaponry as suits you. To entertain likes and dislikes is bad or both commanders and soldiers. Pragmatic thinking is essential.”
-Miyamoto Mushashi

“Generally speaking, fixation and binding are to be avoided, in both the sword and the hand. Fixation is the way to death, fluidity is the way to life. This is something that should be well understood.”
-Miyamoto Mushashi

“When you understand what your shortcomings are and act upon correcting them, that is being a Buddha.”
-Awa Kenzo

“Self-reflection encourages great bravery. Rationalization is your greatest enemy.”
-Awa Kenzo

How To Deal With Cops

I recently had to do an interview to get a security clearance (it’s not for something cool, unfortunately), and the guy interviewing me–having read my books–was shocked I had such a limited criminal history. He just assumed I’d been arrested countless times and indicted on at least a few of them. Not the case.

Don’t get me wrong, I had run-ins with A LOT of cops. I’ve been under threat of arrest and been taken into custody so many times I used to know arrest procedures as well as the guys slapping on the cuffs. Despite all that, I’ve never faced a serious felony charge, or really even a serious misdemeanor. So how did I accomplish that? There is a right way and a wrong way to deal with cops, I did it the right way, and I can teach you how to do that same.

Before I start on this, let me be very clear: This post is NOT intended as legal advice. The only person you should ever take legal advice from is a lawyer who is licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. Yes, I went to law school, but no, that doesn’t mean all my advice is legal advice. Nor does it even mean its good. This post is simply my opinion on the best way to think about the psychology of interactions with law enforcement, and has NOTHING to do with specific legal advice.

Part 1: Understanding Cops

The first step in dealing with cops is empathy. Seriously, it sounds like bullshit, but understanding them and relating with their position is critically important if you want them to let you skate on the stupid things you do.

The 3 Things You MUST Understand About How Cops Think:

1. Cops’ first and biggest concern is safety: I cannot over-emphasize this: The job of a police officer puts him in potentially dangerous situations every day, so everything he does starts with ensuring his personal safety. I’ve known and been friends with so many cops and all of them say the same thing: You’re always on guard because you never know what you’re walking into, and mistakes can get you killed. Every single cop knows other cops who have died in the line of duty. When an officer comes up to a car he’s pulled over or knocks on the door of a home that has reported a domestic disturbance, he has no idea who he’s going to be dealing with. You may understand that you are a perfectly nice, non-threatening person, but he doesn’t know that–he’s thinking about the guy who graduated with him at the police academy and got gunned down by a tweaker on a routine traffic stop last week. This concept—the primacy of personal safety—is drilled into them from the beginning of training onward, so understand that when a cop walks up to you he is–at the very minimum–suspicious and wary.

That is why the first minute of your interaction with a police officer—especially during a traffic stop or potentially dangerous situation–is so crucial. In this small window it is imperative you display the fact that you’re not a threat to him. This can mean hands up and open, a nice calm demeanor, a submissive tone, etc. Your specific actions depend on the situation, but everything you do upon initial contact with a cop should be about displaying the fact that you are not a threat. If you do that right, you will put yourself in a great position with the cop who has your immediate fate in his hands.

I have a Concealed Handgun License for this very reason, even though I never pack a gun. To get one of those in Texas you must have no felony record, go through a 12-hour course, demonstrate marksmanship, and pass a written test. As soon as a cop sees my CHL he relaxes because he knows I’m a responsible citizen. I like to drive fast, and that thing has gotten me out of numerous tickets.

2. Yes, most cops are on power trips: Look, I’m not going to sugarcoat this: most people who become cops do it because at some level they like having power over other people. This doesn’t necessarily make them bad people; for every loser who’s compensating for getting beat up in high school, there are 10 cops who are doing it for the right reasons (they care about their communities and they want to protect good people from criminals). But all cops are motivated, to some extent, by the desire to have power over others.

If you understand that fact, you can prepare for and accommodate it; which means never, under any circumstances, challenging them or their power. Doing that is a direct threat to their identity, and challenging someone’s identity—especially an insecure cop on a power trip–is the surest way to becoming the next Abner Louima.

Here’s the thing about power trips though: a power trip can work to your advantage, if, instead of fighting it, you submit to it. How? Forgiveness is the ultimate display of power. Giving a cop a reason to let you go lets him feel just as powerful as the act of arresting you would, but with none of the paperwork. [More on this later, in the example section]

3. Cops categorize all people into 3 groups: Almost every cop I’ve ever met views all people as belonging to one of three groups; 1. Citizens (i.e., people we protect from criminals), 2. Criminals (people we put in jail), 3. Other cops (one of us).

Why does this matter? Because if you have done something stupid the surest way to get a cop to let you off is to convince him you are a Citizen, NOT a Criminal. Assuming what you’ve done is not a major felony, the cop’s decision to let you go rests mainly on that distinction: Are you a Citizen who made a stupid mistake, or are you a Criminal continuing a pattern of malicious law-breaking? [More on this below, when I give examples of scenarios.] Cops are very lenient with people they think are Citizens, because that’s who they signed up to protect, but they are dicks to Criminals, because in their minds, those are the bad guys. Up to a certain point, what you do is way less important to the cop than who he thinks you are.

 

You can be sure those three behavioral traits apply, at least in basic terms, to all cops. There is another way you need to think about them, though, that will help you understand what to do once you’ve made initial contact. I’ll call it Personality Type. The vast majority of cops fall into three broad Personality Types:

The 3 Types of Cops

1. Blue Collar Pros: This is most cops. These are people who value discipline and order, who aren’t happy behind a desk or in a cubicle, and just want to make decent money while helping good people. They skew toward the athletic and adventurous, with a taste for adrenaline, but they possess the ability to manage and direct those impulses (if you’ve ever wondered why a significant percentage of police are ex-military and why ex-military are so highly sought after by police recruiters, this is why—they’ve already been trained to use violence while subjecting their violent impulses to a system of rules).

These are the cops you don’t want to fuck with because they are the ones most likely to let you off with a warning if you play it cool and act like an adult. All they really want out of people is basic respect and common decency. Of all cops, they are most like you and me, insomuch as we can’t stand a hassle or things being made harder than necessary. And that’s exactly what most small time arrests and tickets are: hassles made harder by idiots who don’t get it. These are the cops who are looking for you to give them a reason not to do a bunch of paperwork. These are the guys who care more about justice in the moral sense than the kind of justice prescribed by the letter of the law. As one former Deputy Sheriff friend of mine put it, there is great satisfaction in “teaching people positive lessons…giving someone a break and them truly being thankful and fixing their mistakes.” As far as cops go, these are the good guys.

Basic Blue Collar Pro Personality Profile:
-Believes in law and order
-Ex-military and/or patriotic
-Average or slightly above average intelligence.
-Prefers dominance/submission displays in human interactions. Both for safety reasons and personal reasons, they like to feel in charge
-Believes at some level he has moral authority and is doing the right thing

General Rules on How to Deal with Basic Blue Collar Pro:
-Be calm and respectful
-Show you aren’t a threat
-Tell the truth
-Don’t bullshit them

2. High School Napoleons: These are the guys (and they are almost exclusively guys) to be most cautious with. These are the small, petty, insecure dickheads on power trips who are looking for you to give them a reason to ticket or arrest you. If the Blue Collar Pros are the good guys, these are most definitely the bad guys. Every one of us has either encountered one of these cops or knows someone from our high schools who became one of them.

The High School Napoleons became cops because they see law enforcement as their chance to level the playing field and show all those entitled pricks from high school that everyone has to play by the same rules. They operate with this massive chip on their shoulders on a daily basis and they take every opportunity to exorcise it on you if you show yourself to be the kind of person who ignored them or kept them in social purgatory or unfairly took what they thought should have been theirs. They will profile you immediately by your car, your clothes, your name, your hair, your alleged transgression, any meaningful class indicator or signal. [If you need an example of a classic High School Napoleon, look no further than George Zimmerman: the guy who killed Trayvon Martin. His history—from high school to present day—is a textbook case. The dude was enrolled in a criminal justice program in hopes of becoming a police officer when he shot the kid.]

High School Napoleon Personality Profile:
-Uses law and order to justify his envy and rage
-Rarely ex-military, expresses patriotism as hate towards immigrants, other marginalized groups
-Below average intelligence (for cops, but still not stupid).
-Keenly aware of dominance/submission displays in interactions, but exclusively for personal reasons

General Rules on How to Deal with High School Napoleons:
-Be obsequious, almost to a fault
-Never do anything that they will perceive as a threat to their power or status as a cop, they overreact to any perceived resistance
-If you REALLY know the law, then you can engage them in procedural discussions. Otherwise, avoid subject entirely
-Understand that most often they aren’t letting you out of what they caught you for, so just swallow it and don’t make it worse by giving them an excuse to increase the charges

3. Legacy Kids: You find these cops in big cities more than anywhere else, but they exist in departments both big and small. They are the people who come from generations of law enforcement, often within that same city or state. They come into the profession already aware of all the little idiosyncrasies of their job and jurisdiction. They know which rules and regulations are just suggestions and which are black letter laws. They know the history and the inner workings of their departments, and because of this, they can be your best friend or your worst enemy—and sometimes both. Depending on their mood and your behavior, they can just as easily let you walk on some pretty serious shit as they can throw every book in the penal code at you for the smallest and pettiest of violations. It’s what you get when you combine the tools of institutional power with the flexibility of discretion and the leverage of knowledge asymmetries. These cops are much harder to identify until you are in the throes of dealing with them. If things are going well, you’ll feel a much more casual, common sense approach. If they aren’t, well then buckle up, because you are about to get it.

Legacy Kids Personality Profile:
-Understand that law and order are very fluid concepts
-Has jaded view of American criminal process. Knows where the “skeletons are buried”
-Above average intelligence. Tend to be smartest of all cop types.
-Also the laziest of cops, is the most likely to let you off if you give them a reason or they think you are a good person

General Rules on How to Deal with Legacy Kids:
-Befriend them as much as possible
-Subtly display that you “get it”
-Talk to them like normal people, but don’t get too familiar or forget that they are cops

 

Part 2: Dealing With Specific Situations

I’m about to explain precisely how this information applies to you, and how you can use it to avoid trouble when dealing with cops, but first you need to understand the unifying concept of all the advice that will follow:

Everything you do when dealing with law enforcement should be about avoiding or limiting your exposure to the criminal justice system.

I’m not here to argue or debate the pros and cons of the American criminal justice system; that’s a different discussion for a different place, and to be honest, the morality of the system doesn’t matter. What matters is that you recognize the justice system for what it is in fact, not what you think it should be in theory. The fact is, the legal system is great in theory, but in practice, it is neither fair nor just. Sometimes good people get fucked and bad people go free. Don’t let the appearance of objective laws deceive you; once you get into the system, anything can happen, and there are no guarantees, ever.

I’m not telling you to not have fun or be crazy, I’m not even telling you not to break laws. I’m telling you that no matter what you do, you don’t want the lumbering machinations of the criminal justice system deciding your fate. Trust me on this, even in the best cases it’s an awful experience. Don’t trust me? Just Google any phrase similar to “screwed up justice system” and read any of the millions of articles that come up.

Keeping this concept in mind, there are two legal concepts you need to understand:

The 2 Legal Concepts You Need to Understand To Properly Deal With Cops

[LEGAL DISCLAIMER (yes, this is the second one): Although Tucker went to law school, he never took the bar and is not licensed to practice law in any jurisdiction. Any advice in this post should be considered for general purposes and is not specific legal advice applicable to your location or situation. And as a side note, if you take legal advice from someone you don't know off the Internet without making sure it's legit where you live and in your specific circumstances, you are stupid and probably deserve to go to jail.]

1. On the scene, cops can do anything they wantAt the scene of the crime, cops are god, they are Shiva Destroyer of Worlds; they can do anything they want, and they know it. They can arrest you for ANYTHING, they can jack you around for hours, they can ruin your entire day in numerous ways, all of them legal.

People have this notion that cops have a strict, iron-clad set of legal guidelines they must follow in every circumstance; that’s preposterous. They have a HUGE amount of discretion at the scene. If you didn’t do anything serious and the cop thinks you are a Citizen because you treated him with respect and defered to his power, he has the ability to give you every benefit of the doubt (and most times he will, if for no other reason than to avoid all the monotonous paperwork).

Conversely, if you are a dick to the cop, or the cop wants to jack you up and take you in for any reason, he can, and there’s nothing you can do about it, even if he’s wrong. He’s going to find a reason to arrest you and if one doesn’t exist he’ll manufacture a tenuous one that will work to justify the arrest.

Granted, if a cop is just jacking you around on bullshit, then in the long run nothing will stick or he won’t end up charging you and you’ll get released…but only after hours or days spent in a holding cell.

But that doesn’t mean anything at the scene. Take this as gospel: if you fuck with a cop, he CAN AND WILL fuck you up. He will do it legally and he will do it gleefully and it will be awful, even if it gets resolved in your favor in the end.

2. Cops don’t judge cases, they only decide if you get arrested: I cannot tell you how many people don’t understand this basic concept, so let me say it very clearly: Cops can only initiate the criminal process (via arrest), they do not make the final judgment or hold any power beyond the arrest. They can’t convict you, they can’t even indict you. They can only arrest you, collect evidence against you and recommend to the prosecutor that the State charge you with a crime.

I know, I know, I just said that cops are god at the scene. And they are. But his power drops dramatically the minute he brings you in and books you into custody. At that point, the power moves to the cop’s superiors at the station and, ultimately, to the prosecutor. The cop goes from major decision maker to small cog once the arrest is made and you’re passed to booking.

This is a critical point, because it determines at what level of discourse you engage the cop at the scene. If you’ve done something wrong, even if it’s small, it is counterproductive to argue guilt/innocence with him. When you do, it codes to a cop brain as something a prosecutor/judge must rule on, not him, so he mentally checks out. You need to engage cops on the level of their discretion–whether or not to even bring you in and initiate the legal process at all–not on the level of your relative guilt or innocence, which is NOT at their discretion.

When you engage a cop on the level of “is this even a crime worth bringing him in???” then you are engaging him at a point where he DOES have the power to decide. This is such an important distinction, and very few people make it.

 

Now, let’s talk about specific situations. It’s impossible to explain every possible situation you may find yourself in with a cop, but as a general rule most police encounters can be divided into four distinct categories, and there is a specific range of actions for each one:

The 4 Basic Cop Scenarios You Will Deal With:

1. You’re totally innocent: I know this may sound counter-intuitive to some of you, especially the crazy libertarians who make the smallest issue into a referendum on the Constitution, but if you have nothing to hide, then don’t hide anything. Law enforcement officers tend to have pretty good bullshit detectors. They may not know what you are hiding, but they know if you are hiding something. And if they think you are hiding something from them, then they’ll move heaven and earth to figure out what it is, especially if they think it could be something big.

If you are truly innocent, let everything out. No matter how absurd the story is, give them every detail, tell them every truth, agree to any test. Be honest, tell the WHOLE story, and 99.9% of the time you will be fine (the only time you won’t is if the cop is trying to jack you up; that situation is covered below).

I cannot tell you how many times when I was younger that cops rolled up on me doing something that looked awful but wasn’t even really a crime, yet the explanation was so fucking ridiculous, I thought no cop would ever believe it. I’d lie, trying to come up with a plausible story, and it never worked. You know why? Because cops are trained to detect lies.

The first thing they’ll do is calm the situation down–get everyone’s heart rate and adrenaline back to normal levels–and ask you what happened or what’s going on. They’ll listen to every word patiently, respectfully, intently. And then, when you’re done, that’s when the questions start coming. They’ll ask you the same questions over and over, from different angles, in different ways, probing for inconsistencies. They aren’t judging the truth of the facts of your story as much as they are judging whether you are lying to them. Unless you are a world class liar, they’re going to trip you, and when they do they are going to think you’re a liar, which to them codes as “Criminal.” Then you’re fucked, even if you haven’t done anything wrong.

You know what does work? Telling the whole fucking truth, even if it sounds ridiculous. If you do, no matter how many times the cops ask you the same questions, your answers are going to be consistent because you’re telling the truth. And, if you actually are innocent, everything will be OK. This isn’t about “trusting the system,” this is about fixing where you code in the cops brain, either as “Citizen” or “Criminal.” Citizens tell the truth; Criminals lie. You want the cop to see you as a Citizen.

These situations happen most often when you are pulled over on a ‘pretense stop’ by cops looking to catch bigger fish (cops often use expired tags, a broken windshield, etc as an excuse to pull people over to check for warrants or drugs) or when you find yourself in the wrong place at the wrong time for reasons entirely out of your control (bar fights, car accidents, locked out and setting off the home burglar alarm, etc). Just remember: Cops, even the asshole High School Napoleons, aren’t interested in wasting their time jacking up innocent Citizens. If you are truly innocent, just lay everything out and be straight with them, and they’ll move on to the Criminals.

One caveat: Don’t play the innocent card unless you are actually innocent. If you’ve seen Cops, you know A LOT of people think that if they act innocent, the cop won’t actually search them. Bullshit. He will, and he’ll catch you. Innocence is not something to toy with. It’s like bluffing top pair with the short stack and the chip leader is on the button. Only play the card if you have it.

2.You’re guilty and caught, but it’s something small and stupid: This is the most common situation: you did something stupid and juvenile that technically makes you guilty of a crime, but the crime itself isn’t really that bad. That describes pretty much every night I went out in my twenties. There are numerous examples; being overly obnoxious at a bar, driving with an expired license, walking around with an open container, constantly honking at some old woman who won’t drive the fucking speed limit, etc, etc.

After much trial and error, I figured out the best way to handle this situation: I admit to the least bad crime the cop knows about, apologize profusely, tell them that I’m an idiot and just made a stupid mistake and won’t do it again, and then put myself at their mercy. I spent a decade in legally tenuous situations, getting out of one after the other (or suffering the minimum possible consequence) because each time I was honest, apologetic and cooperative.

This works because you’re doing three things that incentivize the cop to let you go: 1. You’re signaling to them that you’re a Citizen who made a mistake, NOT a Criminal who’s acting out a pattern (remember, cops want to arrest “Criminals” not “Citizens”) 2. you are appealing to their psychological needs by giving them a chance to forgive you, and thus demonstrate the fullest form of their power (which is the main reason they became cops), and 3. you are saving them from the paperwork and bureaucratic bullshit that comes with every arrest (which appeals to their selfishness and laziness).

This approach covers nearly every form of stupid juvenile idiocy a 20-year old might commit. It is simple and effective, yet so many people do not follow it someone decided to make a show about them: it’s called “JAIL.”

3. You’re guilty, caught, and it’s a big dealIf you are truly guilty–like for real did some serious felony shit and you’re just flat out caught–accept that you’re getting arrested and shut up so you don’t make things worse. Cooperate, be polite and do what the cop says, but shut your mouth and ask for your lawyer and don’t do or say anything else.

For example, say you run a red light and cause a major accident because you were texting and not paying attention. You’re an idiot, the accident is your fault, and you’re fucked. Accept these facts, and operate with them as given assumptions, instead of trying to argue the accident away. You’re going to lose that argument, get arrested anyway, and now you’ve set up the prosecutor’s case. The cop is going to ask you if you were paying attention. He’s going to ask you if you were texting while you were driving. Anything you say at this point can potentially be evidence against you at a criminal trial. SHUT THE FUCK UP. If you did it and you know it and the cop knows it, there is NOTHING you can do at the scene that will either get you off or make it better. You can ONLY make it worse by talking. [Note: this applies doubly so for serious intentional crimes, like robbery or arson].

Cops are not dumb. They are especially good at understanding the application of the law and how to get people to talk in ways that produce the evidence they need to make a case. They don’t have to tell you the truth, either. If they think you’re guilty, they’re going to say anything they think will get you to incriminate yourself or tell a version of events they can pin to you and compare to later testimony. If you know you’re guilty too, understand that there is NO WAY to resolve the situation at the scene. Accept that you’re going to get arrested, and give yourself the chance to unfuck the situation later on by shutting up now and not giving them anything to use against you. Most criminals are convicted, in part or in whole, on evidence they willingly gave to the policeIf you are caught and clearly going to be arrested, and they’re still talking to you about things pertinent to your situation, not just shooting the shit, it’s because they are trying to get evidence to use against you. SO SHUT UP.

Still, some people think they HAVE to talk. If you must say something, politely ask for your lawyer. For example: “Officer, I’d love to talk to you about this, but my friend always makes me promise to call a lawyer before I talk to police. I know, it makes your job a little harder, but I just don’t feel comfortable  unless I take his advice and talk to my lawyer. When she gets here, I’ll be happy to discuss this with you, but until then, I’d like to not say anything.” Or you can be a dick and yell “LAWYER!” over and over; fuck it, you’re already busted, why not?

[Want to watch a great example of how this situation plays out in real life? Go watch a few episodes of the TV show “The First 48.” It’s an amazing show with real cops doing real police work. I would say that over half the cases are made by cops getting people to incriminate themselves when they don’t have to even talk to the police! You can watch it happen in real time on that show. Or, read this (general advice for criminals and idiots) or watch this video (about why to never talk to police if you're guilty or appear to be guilty).]

4. A cop is trying to jack you up, and you know it: Sometimes you run into the wrong High School Napoleon at the wrong time and he just has a hair up his ass about you. It happens. Or maybe a Blue Collar Pro has totally misread a situation and is convinced that you’re guilty, even though you really are innocent. This is the rarest situation thankfully, but it is also the worst. And unfortunately, you are not going to like my advice even though it is unquestionably the best thing you can do: If you are getting unjustly jacked up by a cop, the best thing to do is calm down, relax, stay polite and cooperative, accept what the cop does without fighting him on it, and then seize the first opportunity that presents itself to get out of the situation.

Take what happened to me recently: I was crossing the street, against a red light. I was in the crosswalk and there were no cars coming so it should have been no big deal. I was not even ten feet from the opposite curb when this cop–on a fucking bike–pulled up out of nowhere and commanded me to go back to the other side. I mean…are you kidding? You could not dream up a scenario where a cop could be more pathetic or petty. I could tell from one look at this dude that he was the archetype of the High School Napoleon, and he’d pegged me as a rich asshole who he was going to humiliate while looking for a reason to jack me up. In that moment–in those first 10 seconds–I had a decision to make: Do I argue with the cop and fuck with him right back, or do I just do what he says?

Most people here are going to tell you to fight back, to defend your rights, to go apeshit and tell the cop to fuck off or whatever other posturing nonsense they can think up. And you can do that…but that is a hard battle to fight, especially when the cop has the cuffs and the pepper spray and the law to back him up. That’s a fight you’re going to lose, one way or another.

What you do all depends on how you want to spend your time over the next few months. If you want to spend a night in jail, thousands of dollars on lawyers, hundreds of hours waiting around in court, and subjecting yourself to the random things that can happen in any system, then please, by all means, take the hard road and enjoy the consequences that come with it.

But if you’re like me, having fully identified the type of situation you are facing, you do nothing, you respond to no provocation, you calmly take all his verbal abuse–even though every fiber of your being wants to lash out at this fucking piece of shit small dick asshole cop abusing his power–and you move on with your life. It’s ultimately just better not to punch the tar baby, no matter how much you might want to.

The question you have to wrestle with when you’re getting unfairly jacked up isn’t what should happen in a just world? It’s what is the best way to extricate yourself from the situation at hand and avoid interacting with the justice system? If that isn’t possible at the scene, if the cop is going to arrest or ticket you, all you can do is cooperate and wait until you get to the next layer in the criminal justice system. There a prosecutor or a higher ranking officer can correct the mistake and the arresting officer’s power melts away. So, once you know the cop is out to get you, stop trying to fight him and move on to the battle you can win. Just getting arrested isn’t that big of a deal anyway.

 

Addendum: The Special Problem of DUI’s

I’ve left out any mention of drinking and driving for this reason: It is a very complicated legal issue that is changing rapidly, and there is not any specific advice that applies generally across all jurisdictions.

Of course, the best thing to do is NOT DRINK AND DRIVE. But I won’t sit here and lecture you about that. You know how stupid it is, and so do I; but I’ve done it in the past, and some of you will too.

If you’re going to drink and drive, the one piece of advice I can give you is to take the time now, sober, to figure out how to respond if you get pulled over. Some places it makes sense not to blow. Other places, you’re better off blowing even if you’re going to blow high. And yet in other places your best call is to demand a blood test. Wherever you live, if you’re going to be an idiot and drive drunk, figure out the options available to you and plan for the best response possible…BEFORE the inevitable happens, and you get pulled over.

 

Addendum: The Special Problem of Race

I am white. All my interactions with cops have been with me being white. The fact is, being white in America fundamentally changes the way cops deal with you (and often the way you see cops). If you’re white, cops are much more inclined to see you as a “Citizen.” If you are black (or in some places, any shade of brown) cops are much more inclined to see you as a “Criminal”, even black or hispanic cops. I am not trying to argue whether this is right or wrong, I am just telling you the way it is.

My best advice for black people who have to deal with cops: Be white.

Just kidding (sort of). I am reticent to give advice about dealing with cops from the perspective of a black or Hispanic person because there is nothing more condescending or inaccurate than thinking you know something you haven’t experienced personally. I do know that all my advice above works very well for middle-class white people acting like normal middle-class crazy white people. To the extent that it helps with other racial or ethnic groups, great, but I do not warranty that it will.

Opinions are projections

A lot of people misunderstood the point of my “Total Frat Move” review, so I wanted to explain what was going on.

Its not up to me to decide who or what is the next big thing in fratire. Its up to the people who enjoy fratire. Life is always right, and people vote with their feet. Yes, I started the genre I guess, and yes I have some influence on some people, but its very limited in scope. And most importantly, my influence is only predicated upon my ability to deliver value–as soon as I lose sight of that, I am lost as is all my influence. That is precisely what has happened to professional criticism–they lost sight of what the entire point of their profession is, which is to provide valuable information to the reader. Instead, professional criticism became about the critic. But it goes much deeper than one job. I would say that almost ALL commercial writing is about the writer, and not the reader (which incidentally, is why all of it is shit to read).

But this is a subset of a larger issue, something that I think people have either forgotten or never learned: an opinion (e.g. professional criticism) is nothing more than a projection of the self.

Understand this: Every opinion you have says almost nothing about the object of the opinion, but says volumes about you. This is NOT my way of telling you to have the “right” opinions, so other people will think the “right” things about you. Quite the contrary, this is me telling you how to understand yourself–by looking at your opinions. They are not random. And most importantly, they are not about what you are focusing them on.

Take my review for example: Imagine if I had said I hated TFM, and wrote a long, angry rant about all it’s problems, how awful it was, etc, etc. What would be the first thing you would think?  That I was in some way emotionally threatened by something about TFM, right? Either I was jealous of its success, or mad that something newer and fresher had come along, or envious of something. Of course you would think that, because had I done that, it would have been the truth.

But I didn’t have that reaction at all. There was no rant, no projection, nothing like that. I simply looked at the book for what it was, put it into a larger cultural context as best I could, and told the reader how to decide for themselves if they might like it. My review of TFM had very little to do with me.

Here’s the funniest thing: I absolutely did NOT like the book very much, and I said so in the review. But all the TFM writers thanked me for what I wrote. You know why? Because I didn’t substitute my personal opinion about the book for the objective reality of the book itself. And I was able to do that for two reasons: 1. I understand my emotions well enough at this point to . and most importantly, 2. I know that all opinions are emotional projections.

I’m not saying this to brag about myself. Shit, I have been as guilty as anyone for doing things like that in the past, and still do it to some extent in other areas. But you can learn from this:

Whenever someone talks about something that has nothing to do with them (like offering an opinion on a book), they are talking about themselves not that thing. 

I can even take it a step further for you: Whenever someone hates something that has never done anything to them (like a book for example), they feel emotionally threatened by something it represents to them. Why? Because all opinions are projections of the self.

 

 

 

Working for me can get you a 1.5 million dollar Coke commercial

OK, OK–that headline is complete and utter bullshit, but it made me laugh, so whatever.

This is the awesome story of what one of my former assistants, Jeff Waldman, has gone on to do after working for me. I had nothing to do with it and I get no credit for it, nor am I trying to take any. I’m just really proud of him and what he’s done, it’s incredible.

I’ve written about this some before, but I think it’s a true mark of success when the people who work for you go on to do amazing things on their own. I’m happy about my own success, but sometimes I think I’m even happier about what Ryan Holiday, Jeff Waldman, Ian Claudius, Charlie Hoehn, etc, have gone on to do after working with me. It brings me real joy to see them do so well.

People ask me all the time how I do this, how I’ve had so many assistants do so well so quickly after working with me. I wish I had the answer.

I honestly don’t think I have much to do with it. I think I just pick really smart and motivated people to work with–people who are probably going to do great things anyway–and I just teach them what I know, maybe teach them how to think a little clearer than they did before, and then off they go.

I’ve thought about this a lot, about what I am teaching these guys or what I am showing them, or what they are taking from me, if anything, that helps them. I’d love to figure out how to replicate and scale this process. After all, this is what formal education is supposed to do–teach you how to take your desires and energies and create something valuable with them–but it fails at this for so many people. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that 3 of my 4 former assistants dropped out of college.

But it might not be anything about me or my process. It might just be them and their mindset. Like I said, I think each of those 4 were capable of success before I met them, probably even destined for it.

I wish I could figure out the answer to this question. It would unlock some of the basic truths about education, learning and success.

 

Quotes February 2013 (Alain De Botton edition)

I’ve just finished a huge swath of Alain De Botton’s books. So I’m doing a special quote list of his quotes I liked. Note: A LOT of these come from his Twitter account, which is one of the best that I follow. Bolded quotes are my personal favorites:

“Fault finding without any interest in improvement: cynicism.”

“In love, rather than being idealised as perfect, it seems better to be recognised as deeply flawed – but treated hopefully.”

“Important truths of the age aren’t uttered for fear of the wilful distortions and attacks they’d immediately suffer in the media.” 

“Insomnia is all the thoughts you escaped from having in the day, returning for revenge and their full due.”

“The problem isn’t so much finding good ideas (there is no shortage) as embedding the ones we have into everyday practice.”

“When trying to decode the ‘weird’ behaviour of others, think of the most basic emotions: Fear, Envy, Guilt…”

“How special and omnipresent an adult needs to be is a measure of how invisible they were once made to feel.”

“At a certain point, a ‘boring evening’ becomes one of the most exciting prospects.”

“Being funny should be an incidental byproduct of trying to get to something truthful, not a destination in itself.” 

“Anyone else feel that ache of a needy, fragile, mortal ego adrift in a vast and wholly indifferent universe?”

“Cynicism: disappointing yourself thoroughly before the world gets a chance to do it for you at a time of its own choosing.”

“With many problems, the best you can do is move from feeling individually persecuted to (via art/conversation) collectively sad.”

“So long as we continue to have such trouble telling each other what we really feel, there’ll be room for literature.”

“Anyone who isn’t embarrassed of who they were last year probably isn’t learning enough.”

“Almost all nastiness stems from fragility, sadness, disappointment: an impossible thing to believe when you’re in the line of fire.”

“Mind-body issue: people are so proud to go to the gym; so ashamed to go to a therapist.”

“So easy to settle on feeling misunderstood; so much harder to spell things out.”

“Irony: a way of sliding over emotions without having to feel them.”

“If more people thought for themselves, a good reputation would be far less important.”

“Now the age your parents were at when, as a child, you imagined they knew what was going on, you realize you don’t know what is going on.”

“Parenting: to make them feel so special, they’ll later have the strength to deal with insignificance.”

“Serial philanderers: they are loyal – to the emotions that accompany the start of love.”

“Most of us still caged within careers chosen for us by our not entirely worldly 18-22 year old selves.”

“She was so competitive about seeming good & kind, she would have fought to the death to prove she was nicer than you.”

“As parents know, flattering someone (‘you’re such a good brother’) has its role in enhancing the trait that’s as yet only half there.”

“Definition of good, emotionally-adept parenting: that the child grows up with no wish whatever to become a writer.”

“The double betrayal of a liberal arts education: it neither properly teaches you how to live – nor how to make a living.”

“The need to be liked by people you don’t know (or like) should be treated as an illness like any other.”

“Like the good parent, the lover should first wonder: ‘perhaps they’re sad and scared rather than mean’.”

“When it finally happens, happiness chiefly feels worrying.”

“Great social climbers don’t just cynically exploit the powerful to get to the top: they sincerely fall in love with them.”

“The challenge of modern relationships: how to prove more interesting than the other’s smartphone.”

“Marriage isn’t a vow to stop being interested in other people; more about how to handle that interest.”

“We study biology, physics, movements of glaciers. Where are the classes on envy, feeling wronged, despair, bitternes?”

“Behind almost every inconvenience; a new business waiting to be born.”

“Power replaces sex for the old and the committed.”

“Getting to the top has an unfortunate tendency to persuade people that the system is OK after all.”

“Reputation a bit like a table: one or two marks and everyone notices: a whole host of scratches and it all blends in.”

“Compatibility is an achievement of love, not a precondition.”

“It would be so much easier if we’d stop being mean when, mainly, we’re just hurt.”

“The fear of saying something stupid (which stupid people never have) has censored far more good ideas than bad ones.”

“How aloof and uninterested a parental figure must usually have been for someone to grow up deeply charming.”

“There is no such thing as work-life balance. Everything worth fighting for unbalances your life.”

“Previous generations messed up kids through harshness, neglect. This one: through perfectionist over-attentiveness and ‘kindness’.”

“We should keep a careful diary of our moments of envy: they are our covert guides to what we should try to do next.”

“Always assume that the most cheerful ‘normal’ person may inwardly be fighting immense anxiety and an urge to end it all.”

“The best way to cheer someone up is to be so dark as to exceed their worst fears – and so raise a compensatory laugh.”

“To have a chance to achieve something that will one day be in the news, we have to spend quite a lot of time away from the news.”

“The only people we can still think of as normal are those we don’t yet know very well.”

“The best vaccine against anger: to watch others in its throes.”

“Really polite people don’t seem ‘polite’; just kind.”

“A capacity to appreciate life’s small moments: related to an underlying darker sense that the whole can never be made perfect.”

“The media insists on taking what someone didn’t mean to say as being far closer to the truth than what they did.”

“The hope on picking up a book: it will tell us what we already feel and intuit but haven’t had time to think.”

“How much time we’d save if we transferred emotional knowledge across generations, as we do science or money.”

“A strong desire not to be alone: a sure sign one is incubating a difficult message to tell oneself.”

“Unnatural to expect that learning to be happy should be any easier than, say, learning to play the violin or require any less practice.”

“Gaffe-focused journalism: revenge of intelligent people who know true evils are out there but lack the access/time to get to them.”

“Decadence: a forgetting of how privilege is gained, which heralds its loss.”

“Where there’s an attention seeking partner, an attention denying partner can’t be far behind – and vice versa.”

“People who are plain horrible are so much more survivable than those who also mix in a bit of real love with their abuse.”

“Weakness is principally attractive in the strong.”

“Bitterness: anger that forgot where it came from.”

“Good books put a finger on emotions that are deeply our own – but that we could never have described on our own.”

“An intuition: the unconscious mind has reasons the conscious part still has to catch up with.”

“Proper success for intellectuals should be that their special insights become the common-sense of the next generation.”

Why You Should NOT Go To Law School

[Ed Note: Nils Parker and I wrote this piece together on another blog. That blog's being shuttered because we're going to be doing something different (but similar). We'll announce it soon, in the meantime, this was posted on Huff Post and is now being put here.]

At some point in their life, everyone thinks they should go to law school. You may in fact think you want to go to law school now. You’re wrong. I don’t know you, I have no idea what the facts of your life are, but that doesn’t matter, you aren’t the exception:

For the overwhelming majority of people  (>99.9%), law school is the wrong choice.

How can I know this? Because I’ve been you–I went to law school for the same reasons you think you should go–and I was wrong. I should never have gone to law school, and you shouldn’t either.

If you’re not thinking about going to law school, you can skip this whole post, or just send it to your friends who are thinking about going and thank your god that you’re not them. But if you are one of the many thinking about law school, start by asking yourself one simple question:

“Why do I want to go to law school?”

Yes, it’s an obvious question, but almost everyone in your position either overlooks it or avoids it with bullshit justifications. So answer it, right now, to yourself. You want an easy way to stay in school, you want to be guaranteed a good high-paying job–whatever reason(s) you think you want to go to law school, spell them out and make them explicit to yourself.

I have heard every single answer to this question there is. These are the 6 wrong reasons I hear most often (see if your answer is in this list):

The 6 Wrong Reasons To Go To Law School

1. “I like arguing and everyone says I’m good at it.”

Of all reasons to go to law school, this is the worst by a large margin. Know who else likes arguing? Sports talk radio hosts, cable news talking heads and teenaged girls—i.e., idiots. If you like to argue just for the sake of being contentious, you shouldn’t pick a job based on this unresolved emotional issue of yours, you should get counseling for it.

If you like arguing for the intellectual challenges it can present, that’s an understandable and reasonable position. Everyone likes a healthy, intelligent debate right? Well, understand that being a lawyer has almost nothing to do with arguing in the conventional sense, and very few lawyers ever engage in anything resembling “arguments” in their commonly understood form. You aren’t going to be sitting around a fine mahogany desk sipping scotch with your colleagues discussing the finer points of the First Amendment; you’re going to be crammed in a lifeless cubicle forced to crank out last-minute memos about the tax implications for a non-profit organization trying to lease office space to a for-profit organization (if this gets your juices flowing, maybe the law is for you after all).

You won’t even be having fun discussions in law school. In law school, the people who want to “argue” a lot are called “gunners” and are reviled by everyone, even the professors. Make no mistake about it: Law school is not a bastion of intellectual discourse. It is a fucking TRADE SCHOOL. You are all there to be trained to think and act exactly the same way as everyone else in the profession, so you can then be a drone in the legal system. No one is interested in your opinion. The only one of those that matters is the one expressed, with a capital “O”, by the judge(s) in whatever case you are currently reading.

Beyond that, to be genuinely good at legal “arguing,” you must be dispassionate, reasonable and smart. I have never met a person who was any of those things who also said they were going to law school because other people told them they were good at arguing. It indicates only the shallowest understanding of the law and pathetically sloppy critical-thinking skills. If arguing is really why you want to go to law school, save your money and start a blog about American politics where you can shout into the echo chamber of imbeciles all you want without bothering anyone smart who has shit to do.

2. “I want to be like Jack McCoy from Law & Order [or insert your favorite legal TV show character].”

I have little sympathy for this perspective. It is 2012, if you still allow yourself to be misled by the bullshit on TV, it means you are either very naive or an unrecoverable moron, and you should immediately drown yourself in the nearest toilet to save the world the frustration of having to deal with you and your stupidity. Let me be VERY clear about this for you:

The actual job of being a lawyer is NOTHING AT ALL like what you see on TV.

It is possibly less like the real thing than any other profession depicted on television. Every doctor I’ve ever talked to scoffs at shows like ER and House, but they all say that at least the diagnoses are connected to the physical symptoms we see and are treated with the proper kinds of drugs. In legal dramas, the exact opposite is the case. Don’t think so? The next time you get a DUI (if you’re going to law school to be like Jack McCoy this WILL happen), represent yourself and try to give a speech while questioning the arresting officer. You won’t make it longer than 30 seconds before you’re held in contempt and locked up for wasting everyone’s time. Is that a little harsh? Maybe. Welcome to the grown-up world.

There is NO lawyer/law procedural that even remotely shows what it’s like to be a lawyer. You know why? Because being a lawyer is not only soul-crushing, it’s REALLY BORING, and that doesn’t make for good TV. If you want to know what it’s like to be a lawyer, go work in a law office for a summer. Or shadow a lawyer for a day or two. There’s nothing like a day with a lawyer to disabuse you of the notion that anything in the legal profession is like TV.

3. “It’s the only way I can think of to use my humanities degree.”

Having a soft major is nowhere near the career death sentence that so many make it out to be. The world is changing, and the US economy with it. Most manufacturing and production jobs are moving off shore, if they haven’t already, and the hard science jobs required to staff them are being taken by Indians and Chinese and other people from cultures who actually require their students to learn something in science class. The good news is that our economy is shifting to a service and information based economy, and soft majors are already becoming more and more valuable.

Why? Because a services & information-based economy needs what the Humanities creates: literate, intelligent, well-read people who can write and communicate ideas effectively. The demand for these people is not going to flutter out. In fact, it will only grow stronger as the economy continues to shift and the supply of qualified candidates remains insufficient. Do not make the mistake of thinking law school is your only option. That is simply not true. In plain English: A humanities major now has many, many options they didn’t have in the pre-Internet era.

Beyond that, this reason belies an assumption: That you have to get a job. When you finish school, everyone knows about the two most obvious options: 1. Get a job working for someone else or 2. Get more schooling. But there is a third option: Carve your own path in the world. This can take many different forms, like starting a company [for example see Paul Graham's piece here]. Or it could take the form of many other sorts of lifehacking activities [for example, see Tim Ferriss muse concept, or Chris Guilliebeau's $100 start-up concept]. Or it could be any number of other alternatives that are too extensive to list here, but if you limit yourself to the choices presented to you by people who one did one of those two things—get a job or go back to school—then you obviously aren’t going to understand that. There are other ways to make a living, and lots of people following those paths, you just have to go look for them.

4. “I want to change the world/help homeless people/rescue stray kittens/do something noble.”

Look, wanting to help others is great, but if you are one of those rosy-eyed dipshits who sign anti-sweatshop petitions while wearing Nikes (made in Vietnam by children) and listening to your iPod (made in China by virtual slaves) you know what’s going to happen when you finally go out into the world trying to change it equipped with just a law degree and a healthy dose of optimism? Life is going to kick you in the teeth. Repeatedly.

If you go to law school with just some vague notion of public service and no sense of real, directed purpose, you WILL regret your decision. My first day in law school, the entire class was gathered in a lecture hall and they asked everyone who wanted to be in public service to raise their hand. At least 100 people did. Do you know how many ended up in a public service job three years later? Three of them. The other 97+ didn’t stop wanting to make the world a better place, they just didn’t know what it actually MEANS to help poor people for $30,000 a year when they raised their hands three years earlier. They hadn’t tested their moral resolve in the crucible of suffocating debt. A $140,000/year job at Skadden Arps is a hard thing to ignore when you’re staring down the barrel of a $150,000+ nut and $1700+ monthly loan payments that start real quick after graduation.

If you want to cultivate a life full of bitterness and resentment a good way to do it is go to law school thinking you’re going to be a crusader for change, then end up having to become the very opposite–a corporate lawyer drone–to pay off your law school debt. This happens to pretty much everyone in law school. If you want to change the world, that’s awesome–go do it. Don’t go to law school.

5. “I don’t know what else to do.”

If you are coming to the end of your schooling and don’t know what to do, or just otherwise feel lost in life, you shouldn’t feel bad. It’s OK. You’re not alone. At least you have an excuse: You’re barely old enough to drink, you don’t need to know what you’re going to do with the rest of your life at this point.

If your parents and guidance counselors say that you should have already “picked a direction” or “figured out a plan for your future” by now, ignore them. The pressure and admonitions they are foisting upon you aren’t about your happiness or your success; it’s about theirs. It’s about validating themselves as good parents and qualified counselors. If they see you go to law school, to them it means you a) got good grades, b) went to college, c) didn’t drop out, d) didn’t commit (m)any felonies, e) have ambition and f) will make six-figures. By every traditional measure, they have succeeded in their prescribed roles.

None of this, of course, has anything to do with whether you are happy or fulfilled or even like the law; which are the most important considerations when making a decision like this. So relax. If you need more time to find your calling, that’s fine, take it. Try lots of things, see what you like. Try working in a law firm, you’ll see REAL fast that you hate it (or you’ll love it, and thus validate your law school choice).

6. “I want to make a lot of money.”

If there’s one thing you can’t argue with, it’s that lawyers make a lot of money, right? I mean, a corporate lawyer starts at something like $140k a year, that’s huge, right?

Wrong. WRONG.

$140k+ to start sounds like a lot of money, until you break it down. Currently, most large corporate firms—where you will find these six-figure starting salaries—require somewhere between 1900-2000 billable hours from their associates. This is not the total number of hours you have to be in the office, this is the total number of hours of actual work you can bill directly to a client. For a smart attorney with a solid work ethic, it typically takes about 10 hours in the office to accrue 7 billable hours; tracked most often in 6 minute or 1/10th of an hour segments. If we take the lower end of the billable requirement threshold (1900 hours), that means a typical attorney has to work about ~2700 real hours in a year to meet their minimum billables. To put that in perspective, 2700 hours is equal to working 7.5 hours a day EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE YEAR. Using a $140,000 base salary, that’s equivalent to making ~$50/hour [FYI--here’s a short list of other careers that pay $50/hour or more and do not require a) 3 years of post-graduate schooling and $150k in debt or b) you to work 365 days a year to get it].

This is what people mean when they talk about something that looks too good to be true. There is a reason so many lawyers leave the legal field: Being a lawyer–especially a lawyer at the type of big corporate firm that seemingly pays so well–SUCKS. The American Bar Association has published several studies about the incredibly low job satisfaction of lawyers and in every survey they publish, most lawyers say they would NOT be a lawyer if they had it all to do over again.

Perhaps the most important thing for you to understand, there are NOT an unlimited number of jobs out there that start at $140,000/year. In fact, there aren’t many at all, and pretty much ALL of them go to kids who come from the Top 15 law schools. Beyond that, the overall legal job market has dried up, even the low paying jobs. They aren’t going to tell you any of this at law school recruitment receptions; in fact schools continue to tell prospective students the opposite, which is why more and more of them are being sued for fraud.

I cannot be any clearer about this: You are not guaranteed a job out of any law school, much less a job that pays six figures.

Now, ask yourself the question again:

“Why do I want to go Law School?”

If ANY of the 6 above reasons describe why you want to go to law school, stop now. Seriously. No qualifiers on this statement, just stop. DO NOT GO. You will regret it.

If you think you have one of the good reasons to go to law school you’re still not out of the woods:

The Problem of Debt

There are many perfectly valid reasons to go to law school. You may very well have one of them. But even if your reason for going to law school is rock solid, you still need to consider one major thing: Debt.

I’ve mentioned this multiple times above, because it is so crucially important to making the right decision about law school. Debt is the elephant in the room that law schools never tell you about, but ends up dominating your life.

Law school is three years long. If you go to an average law school and don’t get any tuition help or scholarships, you are going to spend ~$150,000 all-in, at least. That’s 3 years of tuition, assorted fees, books and living expenses. Unless you are one of the few whose parents set up a tuition fund for BOTH your undergrad AND your grad school, that means you are going to be taking loans. This means you are going to start your law job already 150k in the hole–and that’s not counting any undergrad debt you may be carrying. This means you are going be making a $1700/month payment for about a decade. On just your grad school debt.

And make no mistake about it: Once you are in debt, they fucking have you. In a straight-forward approximation, a starting salary of $140,000/year would put our intrepid new lawyer in the 28% tax bracket. Loan payments will take another 14.57% of his per-unit-time income. To a first-degree approximation then, it is accurate to say 42.5% of our INL’s income dissipates before being touched by him/her. It’d be funny if it wasn’t so fucking sad.

Even if you started off law school with the best of non-profit save-the-world intentions, when you are staring a $1700 per MONTH payment in the face, you WILL end up scurrying to work for a white collar sweatshop. And you will hate it, like everyone does, and you WILL want to leave, like everyone does, but you won’t be able to–like everyone else can’t–because you will have too much debt to pay off.

So you’re going to spend a decade toiling 12 hours a day for what? To pay off the debt you incurred to get that job!? HOW FUCKING CRAZY IS THAT!?!

Well guess what—THAT IS THE LAW SCHOOL RACKET.

But Don’t Just Believe Me

I asked some friends who are lawyers to read a preliminary version of this post and give me their feedback. I’ll leave you with their quotes:

“I would HIGHLY recommend that anyone who is thinking of law school spend a year as a paralegal or as some sort of staff at a law firm before going to law school. Enough so that you can see 1) what young attorneys have to do 2) hear how much they bitch about hating it and 3) dispel any notions about ANY law firm caring about their associates or being “family friendly”. Because that is a damn expensive mistake to make if you find out you don’t like the practice of law. I went to a very good, very expensive law school and started out at a big firm. I hated it. I have since moved on to a smaller firm, which I do like more. But in all honesty, if I could do it all over, I would not go at all. And if I wasn’t staring 100K in student loans in the face, I would probably quit firm practice altogether.”

 

“I have worked as a paralegal in some form of legal (family, bond, litigation) for 14 years now. I have yet to meet an attorney who is satisfied with his lot in life. I am not saying everyone non-esquire is thrilled with theirs, just that on a whole, these are some of the saddest, most down-trodden people I have known in my life. Most of my best friends are attorneys so I hear first hand about the student loans they are STILL paying off at 38; the huge houses and Mercedes’ they purchased well beyond their means to “keep up with the Joneses” (aka every other attorney in the firm); the misery that is their ongoing marriages; the ridiculous hours; ice cold dinners; the utter lack of originality in their conversations; etc., etc., etc. Listening to these woes sucks the energy out of me everytime they come up. The most common nugget I hear: “Why, God WHY did I choose this profession?”"

 

“Nobody ever told me that I would be keeping time sheets that require me to divide my days into six-minute increments. Nobody told me I would have to choose between doing it right and doing it on a budget. The words “the client is cost-sensitive” burn my ears. But the marketing shit is the worst. The push to bring in business and schmooze potential clients and “cross-sell” within the firm. It’s worse at some firms than others, but it is absolute misery to me no matter how much or how little marketing I may be doing. I’ve been practicing for 10 years, most of that time in big firms, and I have yet to get used to the business side of things. So I suppose that would be my take on things: even if you are going to law school for all of the “right reasons,” odds are you will spend a significant portion of your day as the used-car salesman from Hell whose boss is nickle and diming you to an early grave.”

 

“As I write this, it is 85 degrees, sunny, with a slight, cooling breeze coming from the West. The only reason I know this is that I took twenty minutes to run to get a sandwich to eat at my desk. I am sitting in a basement office which houses three of us, putting off research on state law fair debt collection vs. the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the definition of a creditor to write this post. If that paragraph alone doesn’t deter someone from law school, then I don’t know what will.”"

And my personal favorite, from a friend of mine who is a partner at a huge multi-national firm:

“I am a partner in one of the largest law firms in the world (measured by either revenue or # of lawyers). I had two associates pull all-nighters last night. I doubt either of them has slept more than 3 or 4 hours any night this week. I wonder if they are regretting their decision to go to law school? I’d ask, but I don’t really care. Tucker, I’d really prefer if you did not do anything to cut off the supply of drones. Fortunately, the ones who will actually be persuaded by your speech are not the ones we want working here. I actually agree with everything you said in your speech. However, whoever posted the job satisfaction stat about 76% being unsatisfied, that means 24% are satisfied. You may be in the 24%.”

Conclusion
Here is the funny thing about this piece: Every bit of knowledge in this piece was conferred to me before I got to law school. Much of it was told to me BY LAWYERS who repeatedly stressed how much they HATED their jobs. At this point, even the ABA is telling college kids not to go to law school.

You know what I did? I fucking ignored it. I mean, sure all of those other assholes may be miserable and may hate the legal profession, but what do they know, they’re only lawyers? If you’re laughing at my ignorance, you’re right to laugh. I was stupid.

Don’t be me. Don’t go to law school. Go do something with your life that you’ll enjoy, is rewarding and productive and makes the world a better place.

 

—————–
Further reading:

This document echoes essentially everything said above on the topic. A good first person account. More first person accounts. A real lawyer breaks down the fallacies of other common pro-law school arguments. other And a great collection of real data about law schools and their placements rates.

Special Question: But I’m already in law school. What do I do now?

Quit. I’m totally serious. Quit. Today. Walk away, while you still have time. No qualifiers, no half-steps. Walk out now, before the golden handcuffs are slapped on.